Speaking of Trans-humanism, a Trans-humanist public speaker and supporter of Gay Marriage who got fundraising support back from SBS, Lee Rhiannon (Greens), and of course Marriage Equality Inc was the now jailed top Australian Gay Marriage Activist - infant anal sex porn lover - Dr Matthew Hynd. Have you tried some of the infant sex lover brewed "Slurp Marriage Equality Tea"? Ads for the boylover brewed child sex marriage equality tea still online at http://twitter.com/slurptea1
All profits raised by the gay child sexers on the run from the FBI after a search warrant was executed in 2010 went to Queensland AIDS council that doesn't want to give the money to a child abuse prevention charity. They proudly accept infant sex lovers support gay marriage and visa versa. We'll gladly accept child raping pedophiles opening their checkbooks to support the gay cause to get custody of young boys without saying sorry. In fact they made a false police report saying suggesting they give their infant sex lover raised marriage equality cash to bravehearts inc was some kind of extortion. They say it's more appropriate that they set the precident that infant sex lovers financially support gay marriage - and that's ok with Marriage Equality INC. They will fight to hold onto their jailed infant sex lover raised cash reserves,
I broke the story with Robert Stacy McCain aka #FreeStacy
The NSW NEWCASTLE GAY CHILD SEX POLICE COMMANDER IN CHIEF TOLD JOHN SUNOL HE WOULD BE JAILED IF HE DIDN'T REMOVE MY BLOG POST CRITICIZING AUSTRALIAN MARRIAGE EQUALITY DOING AN FBI NY ALBANY FIELD OFFICE INFANT SEX CHILD PORN FUGITIVE FUNDRAISER DRIVE TO RAISE MONEY TO SUE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO GAY PARTNER ILLEGAL OVERSTAYER GAY PROTEST REFUSAL OVERRULED VISAS SO THE CHILD PORNOGRAPHER COULD BRING IN HIS PAKI PHOTOGRAPHER BOYFRIEND (AliChoundry.com) INTO THE COUNTRY TO LIVE WITH OUR CHILDREN. THE "GAY RIGHTS ISSUE" - of infant sex lovers not having their "gay rights" infringed to bring their mates into the country was brought up by all the national media. But the gay infant sex lovers arrest was not. Funny eh?
My saga started with gay police giving visas to illegal immigrant overstayers too. What a surpise! That will be covered in detail in due course with evidence of top detective's doing perjury (- either that or my retired barrister lied on a stat dec. You can decide. ) and the illegal immigrant after the visa threatening special gay police 60c nsw crimes act prosecution before the search warrant was executed - ON CAMERA
Maybe the fact John Sunol hasn't been arrested yet is because those were false police threats the Newcastle gay child fuck police commander in cheif can't make good on to support infant sex love? Come out of the closet mate. Don't be shy. You can let everyone know you are a boylover and make good on your boylover inspired threats!
What happened was The Gutless NSW gay child rapist protector police brought Sunol into the station but broke the LEPRA act and didn't do a recorded interview (with the proper equipment bar an "iphone" that can be editored / doctored to remove the incriminating bits from the gay pedo cops) where they made their threats they haven't made good on yet. If you are going to say it's a crime to be against infant sex - I say to you Newcastle Commander in cheif grow some balls. Also do something about this Newcastle business fostercare.lsb.org.au getting 50k Federal Grant to say the best foster carer in QLD is a gay dad the QLD police service charged with foster son anal rape.
My next post will be on the history of the gay pedophile protector police being started by Marriage Equality satanic cult members Gregory Tillet, and how people in NSW have been jailed for religious discrimination of the religion of gay child rape and boy murder aka otoaustralia.org.au - all with special NSW gay child rape police (facebook.com/policeglbti) involvement. (Search Legg / Devine on Austlii for the case law)
That assertion I make is difficult to verify. At the end of the day folk will believe what they want to believe. To me the assertion is self-evident. An old Chinese saying asks "Does one need a torch to see the sun?". As in the Climate Change debate, there will be those who believe in future catastrophe and those who don't, because the issue is scientifically complex and evidence of both sides is disputed. In this debate, I could also ask you to provide evidence that my hypothesis is false. In my research on the issue I came across medical publications that supported my hypothesis. One such publication leads to the conclusion that a homosexual male is ten times more likely to sexually molest children than is a heterosexual male. There will be of course papers called up by homosexual lobby groups that will purport the opposite conclusion. The reference: Freund K and Watson RJ. "The proportions of heterosexual and homosexual paedophiles among sex offenders against children: an exploratory study", Journal Sex Marital Ther. 1992, Spring; 18(1):34-43. The abstract of that paper is as follows: “Previous investigations have indicated that the ratio of sex offenders against female children vs. offenders against male children is approximately 2:1, while the ratio of gynephiles to androphiles among the general population is approximately 20:1. The present study investigated whether the etiology of preferred partner sex among paedophiles is related to the etiology of preferred partner sex among males preferring adult partners. Using phallometric test sensitivities to calculate the proportion of true paedophiles among various groups of sex offenders against children, and taking into consideration previously reported mean numbers of victims per offender group, the ratio of heterosexual to homosexual paedophiles was calculated to be approximately 11:1. This suggests that the resulting proportion of true paedophiles among persons with a homosexual erotic development is greater than that in persons who develop heterosexually.” -- If one is reasonably capable of doing arithmetic, one can roughly apply the above data to, say, a representative sample of 100,000 adults in the Australian population. The ratio of 20:1 referred above implies that there will be 95,200 opposite-sex attracted adults and 4,800 same-sex attracted adults in that sample size. If we now assume, for arguments sake, that approximately 1% of all children suffer from some form of sexual molestation at the hands of an adult, then we can assume that 1000 children have been sexually molested in some way by that sample size of 100,000 adults. The above ratio of 2:1 suggests that, of those 1000 unfortunate children, 667 will be girls and 333 will be boys. The report says that it is rare that an adult female sexually molests a child, so we will ignore such unlikely events and assume that only adult males molest children. Therefore the sample size of 100,000 adults would contain approximately 47,600 opposite-sex attracted males and 2,400 same-sex attracted males. These numbers indicate a ratio of 36 heterosexual adult males per female child sexually molested, but a ratio of 3.6 homosexual males per male child sexually molested. On this simplistic analysis of the data, a homosexual male is 10 times more likely to molest a child than a heterosexual male. This debate is considered critical to resolve before society passes laws to legitimize two adult males of unverified sexual orientation being free to marry each other and to become “gay dads” by acquiring babies through adoption or surrogacy.